메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.38 No.1
발행연도
2002.3
수록면
5 - 24 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Shakespeare's dramas there are a lot of meta-linguistic expressions to reveal his skepticism on language. Most characters of his dramas continually are talking about words and language: the limits of language and the way in which meaning slips away. In Hamlet, through Hamlet's puns, Shakespeare shows us the instability of signs. Hamlet lives in a society where language has been debased and sincere dialogues are impossible. There he uses 'wild and whirling words' to protect himself from Claudius. Hamlet uses language unconventionally and interprets other people's messages arbitrarily ignoring their original meaning.
Hamlet's pun has a lot of functions. First of all, it is a linguistic disguise to hide his mind from Claudius' group. And it is a means to disturb the social stability of Claudius' court. And then, it is the expression of his open attitude to view the world affairs: he thinks there is nothing determinate in the world, saying 'there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so'. Lastly, it discloses Hamlet's unconsciousness. Disgust at Gertrude's incestuous marriage to Claudius is expressed in his wordplay, a distorted linguistic form.
By using those puns and other forms of wordplay frequently Shakespeare tells us that words, like any other human actions, have multiple meanings. Hamlet's puns which have a kinship with Derridian wordplay and Bakhtinian heteroglossia warn us about the danger of drawing premature conclusions in anything.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003101638