지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The ‘Internal Development Theory’ means the historial methods and perception on Korean history, which was conducted in North and South Korea, and Japan during the 1960s and 1970s. It arose as a project that tried to replace colonial historiography with the post-colonial one based upon the one country perspective. This new perspective was predicated upon the nation state building.
This theory in Korea is divided into two categories. One is to show internal capacity and development in contrast to heteronomous and stagnant theory featuring the colonial historiography. It has an aim that seeks for the ‘(scientific) systemization of Korean history.’ The other is the ‘capitalism sprout theory’ which finds outlook for the possibility to achieve autonomous modernization in the socioeconomic changes since the late Joseon dynasty.
This article aims to show the two ‘internal development theory’ schools in terms of the formation and process of this theory, and to find an alternative discourse to overcome the limits of the two schools. Many ideas are already suggested: understanding the systemization of Korean history through the more scientific research in terms of positivistic and theoretical dimensions, the elucidation on the traditional economy which is precondition to modern economic development, and diverse development possibilities which overcomes the western model. All are eclectic alternatives.
In addition to these ideas, I suggest the ‘regional history’ which crosses the territorial boundaries and sets up the diverse communities. This history would lessen the gravity of the state/national history while it appreciates the value of human communal life. Through this alternative ideas, the ‘internal development theory,’ which was a method for one state/national historiography during the nation state formation era, would complete its historical mission and would be reborn filled new concepts and contents.
This theory in Korea is divided into two categories. One is to show internal capacity and development in contrast to heteronomous and stagnant theory featuring the colonial historiography. It has an aim that seeks for the ‘(scientific) systemization of Korean history.’ The other is the ‘capitalism sprout theory’ which finds outlook for the possibility to achieve autonomous modernization in the socioeconomic changes since the late Joseon dynasty.
This article aims to show the two ‘internal development theory’ schools in terms of the formation and process of this theory, and to find an alternative discourse to overcome the limits of the two schools. Many ideas are already suggested: understanding the systemization of Korean history through the more scientific research in terms of positivistic and theoretical dimensions, the elucidation on the traditional economy which is precondition to modern economic development, and diverse development possibilities which overcomes the western model. All are eclectic alternatives.
In addition to these ideas, I suggest the ‘regional history’ which crosses the territorial boundaries and sets up the diverse communities. This history would lessen the gravity of the state/national history while it appreciates the value of human communal life. Through this alternative ideas, the ‘internal development theory,’ which was a method for one state/national historiography during the nation state formation era, would complete its historical mission and would be reborn filled new concepts and contents.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 기원과 배경
Ⅲ. 내재적 발전론 형성의 두 계열
Ⅳ. 진화와 전환
Ⅴ. 평가와 전망
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (50)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-004174537