지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.6
- 수록면
- 13 - 24 (12page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study finds out the spatial composition of Korean and Chinese Houses with space syntax.
The results of analysis so far are summarized as follow.
First of all, korean house shall have priority in visible division system for gender classification and in space system for the distinction of status. But For chinese house, in visible or invisible, the higher hierarchy of space is placed more inside of the house.
While korean house have high connectivity and opened space with MaDang, chinese one have closed space system. It shows difference between korean house which get privacy and authority by opened spaces and chinese house which get privacy by closed and deep spaces. So, although similar courtyard system, they shows different space system each other. Next, in case of apartment of nowadays, korean one have more opened spaces than chinese one. And It shows that korean apartment still reflect traditional lifestyle, preferred space and social structure.
Korean house’s opened space with MaDang has evolved into space of nowadays apartment of korea around livingroom. On the other hand, although chinese traditional house is in progress with yunzi(院子) as center, nowadays apartment of china is in progress with dining room. Also, China is identified as having more independence from personal space than Korea.
The results of analysis so far are summarized as follow.
First of all, korean house shall have priority in visible division system for gender classification and in space system for the distinction of status. But For chinese house, in visible or invisible, the higher hierarchy of space is placed more inside of the house.
While korean house have high connectivity and opened space with MaDang, chinese one have closed space system. It shows difference between korean house which get privacy and authority by opened spaces and chinese house which get privacy by closed and deep spaces. So, although similar courtyard system, they shows different space system each other. Next, in case of apartment of nowadays, korean one have more opened spaces than chinese one. And It shows that korean apartment still reflect traditional lifestyle, preferred space and social structure.
Korean house’s opened space with MaDang has evolved into space of nowadays apartment of korea around livingroom. On the other hand, although chinese traditional house is in progress with yunzi(院子) as center, nowadays apartment of china is in progress with dining room. Also, China is identified as having more independence from personal space than Korea.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ 전통 주거：양반 주택과 사합원
Ⅲ. 현대의 공동주거
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (11)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국과 중국 주거문화를 통한 전통가구 비교연구 : 조선시대 '반가'와 명, 청시대 '사합원'을 중심으로
김국선
,
이연숙
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2003
.12
주거환경 조성원리의 탐색
이학동
주거환경
2003
.11
‘大寺’창건과 百濟 · 倭의 교섭
이다운
동북아 문화연구
2013
.03
15 - 19세기 韓·中 전통 주거에 나타난 공간 특성 연구 : 조선시대 반가와 명ㆍ청시대 북경 사합원을 중심으로
최경란
,
류태준
,
허윤실
외 1명
Archives of Design Research
2011
.08
한국전통주택과 북경사합원에 관한 비교 연구
표응석
동북아 문화연구
2011
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-595-001477588