메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Kang, Seokhan (Konkuk University)
저널정보
미래영어영문학회 영어영문학 영어영문학 제23권 제1호
발행연도
2018.2
수록면
455 - 476 (22page)
DOI
10.46449/MJELL.2018.02.23.1.455

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The paper investigates whether teacher raters differentiating L1 nativeness affect their rating patterns in the English speaking assessment and, if so, what criteria cause the difference. More specifically, this study examines (1) the particular characteristics in setting up the criteria design between the two groups (native English teacher raters vs. non-native Korean English teacher raters), (2) the rating patterns of both groups’ actual assessment as the criteria application, and (3) test-takers’ response to the teacher raters’ evaluation of both groups. The results show that teacher raters of the two groups approach the criteria design and application differently in a subtle way, which results in different assessment patterns, and finally has an influence on the test-takers’ satisfaction levels. There are some similarities and differences between both groups. In the survey of the criteria design, both groups set up the topic performance and expression abilities as the most important constructs in the assessment, whereas the accuracy of grammar is considered less important. However, the two groups present different sets of opinions on interactions, expression ability, and relevant knowledge. In the survey for the test-takers, the respondents show no statistically significant difference between the two groups. However, differences have been found in some constructs. Finally, the criteria design by the effect of raters’ L1 nativeness affect the raters’ application patterns, in which these characteristics cause various responses of the test-takers involved.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Previous Studies
Ⅲ. Research methods and procedures
Ⅳ. Designing the criteria
Ⅴ. Survey
Ⅵ. Ratings
Ⅶ. Survey for the test-takers
Ⅷ. Conclusion
References
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-740-001803405