메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
황선영 (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
이중언어학회 이중언어학 이중언어학 제65호
발행연도
2016.12
수록면
281 - 306 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The aim of this study was to see the acquisition of Korean tenses among 90 Cambodian Korean learners. In Korean, time is represented through tense morphemes, whereas in Cambodian, an isolating language, certain vocabulary represents the time. Therefore, Cambodian Korean learners may have difficulties learning tense morphemes as the two languages have little morphological similarity. Especially, Cambodian learners can have struggles understanding deictic projections where the items are interpreted differently according to the discourse context. By separating the Korean tenses whose basic meanings coincide with the actual time referred by their tense morphemes and those that do not, the study examined the learners’ acquisition of tenses. For this purpose, we have three following research questions; a) Do Cambodian Korean learners show different levels of tense acquisition according to their levels of proficiency?; b) Is there a correlation between the acquisitions of tenses according to their types (i.e. whether their basic meanings and the actual time referred to are the same or not)?; c) With which type do the learners have most difficulties in acquiring? For the research question a), we put the learners into two different groups by their TOPIK scores, and ran a t-test for independent samples. For question b), we computed the Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient for each type of items, and for c), we examined the level of acquisition by types, using the mean value of each item. Results showed that the level of proficiency does not affect the acquisition of tenses significantly. Moreover, the correlation between the acquisitions of tenses according to their types appeared to be very weak. This suggests that acquiring the basic meanings of tenses does not imply the acquisition of variable tense items according to their contexts of discourse. Especially, the most challenging appeared to be the type where the present tense refers to the past or vice versa. However, the level of understanding for the present tense referring to the future was exceptionally high, as it has be explicitly taught in class. This suggests the impact of explicitly teaching the items that are interpreted from the context of discourse. Therefore, the pragmatic items should be taught more explicitly.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0