지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.3
- 수록면
- 5 - 31 (27page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to compare viewpoints on women in the works of Shakespeare, Dryden and Shaw. These three playwrights wrote at different times - the Renaissance, Neo-classical and Victorian Periods - with different ideas about women. However, they all wrote plays based on Cleopatra's story, so their ideas on women can be revealed by comparison of their Cleopatras. Shakespeare had two viewpoints on women, one was conservative and the other was progressive. His Cleopatra is very aggressive and active, but she did not overcome the challenge of succeeding in a man's world. Shakespeare accepted women's positive aspects but refused too much challenge for his society's safety and well-being.
Dryden, with a conservative viewpoint on women, created a Cleopatra who was quite different from the historical one. His Cleopatra was very passive and submissive, which were considered as ideal women's qualities at that time.
Shaw presented the development of Cleopatra from a girl to a queen in his work. He believed that women's qualities could be progressive, and that women could even be better than men if they were educated. He had positive ideas about women and acknowledged their possibilities.
In conclusion, we can see three playwrights' women in their plays. Shakespeare's Cleopatra was progressive as well as traditional. Dryden's Cleopatra was a traditional one who was quite different from an original one. Shaw had a progressive idea of women, so his Cleopatra showed possibilities and potentials as a queen as well as a woman.
Dryden, with a conservative viewpoint on women, created a Cleopatra who was quite different from the historical one. His Cleopatra was very passive and submissive, which were considered as ideal women's qualities at that time.
Shaw presented the development of Cleopatra from a girl to a queen in his work. He believed that women's qualities could be progressive, and that women could even be better than men if they were educated. He had positive ideas about women and acknowledged their possibilities.
In conclusion, we can see three playwrights' women in their plays. Shakespeare's Cleopatra was progressive as well as traditional. Dryden's Cleopatra was a traditional one who was quite different from an original one. Shaw had a progressive idea of women, so his Cleopatra showed possibilities and potentials as a queen as well as a woman.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 엘리자베스 조의 여성 위치와 셰익스피어의 여성 인식
Ⅲ. 신고전주의 시대의 여성위치와 드라이든의 여성인식
Ⅳ. 빅토리아 조의 여성위치와 쇼의 여성인식
Ⅴ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
성서적 관점에서 본 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』 : 클레오파트라의 교만, 음란, 파괴성
Shakespeare Review
2004 .09
-
담론과 타자 재현의 양상 : 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』
Shakespeare Review
2004 .06
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 전복성
영어영문학21
2017 .01
-
Histrionic Cleopatra as a Critic of Patriarchy - A Feminist Study of Antony and Cleopatra
Shakespeare Review
1995 .12
-
『앤토니와 클레오파트라』 - 신화적 인물로서의 앤토니와 클레오파트라
Shakespeare Review
1998 .12
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』다시 읽기 : Theatre and World
Shakespeare Review
2001 .03
-
여성의 부재와 여성성의 전복성 : Antony and Cleopatra에 나타난 여성의 재현
코기토
1998 .12
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 페미니즘 전략과 그 한계
Shakespeare Review
2006 .12
-
프로이드의 욕망이론에 비춰본 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』
Shakespeare Review
2003 .03
-
Antony and Cleopatra에 나타난 성역할의 전도
Shakespeare Review
1990 .06
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 욕망과 도덕성의 갈등의 기상도
Shakespeare Review
2002 .06
-
크롬웰의 공화정을 전후한 극장건축구조 변화에 따른 극적 담론과 공연방식의 차이 : 『안토니와 클레오파트라』와 『사랑을 위하여』 사례연구
새한영어영문학
2006 .02
-
Bernard Shaw의 Caesar and Cleopatra 연구 : 탈식민주의 페미니즘 관점에서 본 여성문제
현대영미드라마
1996 .03
-
셰익스피어의 『안토니와 클레오파트라』와 뮤지컬 〈클레오파트라〉(2008)의 비교 연구
Shakespeare Review
2009 .09
-
G. B. Shaw의 歷史劇에 대한 硏究 : Caesar and Cleopatra와 The Man of Destiny를 중심으로
새한영어영문학
1993 .10
-
Domesticating the "Infinite Variety" : Shakespeare's Cleopatra and the Discourse of Orientalism
Shakespeare Review
1996 .06
-
디도와 클레오파트라
고전 르네상스 영문학
2014 .01
-
Antony and Cleopatra : 心象과 性格發展
Shakespeare Review
1973 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-002476456