지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2002.6
- 수록면
- 333 - 357 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Antony and Cleopatra we are never in any doubt of our moral bearings. And it embodies different and apparently irreconcilable judgements between desire and morality of our practical experience. There is the view, with which the play opens, of those who speak badly of Antony's stay with Cleopatra in Egypt. But the lustful attitude, Antony is attached to, is strongly represented in the play, and there are repeated references to 'lascivious wassails', 'the amorous surfeiter', 'salt Cleopatra', 'the adulterous Antony' who shows his potential attitude toward his private life.
Antony and Cleopatra is an account of conflicting story in terms of the Desire and the Morality, Rome and Egypt, the two great contraries that maintain and destroy each other, considered apart from any other people that might stand over against them. If readers find, rightly, that there is something both vague and strained about all these accounts, perhaps that is because a remarkable fact about the bond between Antony and Cleopatera has been consistently overlooked. Whether the bond in question is love, or passion, or both, it is neither of these which the lovers themselves mainly bring to light when they speak of each other or of what is between them.
Most critics have tried to express how the relation between Antony and Cleopatra can be variously seen from many different viewpoints. Mr. Bradley, who said that from one point of view the play was Shakespeare's supreme expression of love as value, also said that to see it as depicting a senseless surrender to passion was defensible. Whether Antony and Cleopatra's lust, or love, or something of both, is probably a matter on which complete agreement cannot be expected. Men use these words as they are guided not only by their sense of value, but also by their experience of life; both of these are liable to much variation, and the critic may find that opportunities for augmenting the second are, in his case, slight, past or unwelcome.
Cleopatra's lament over te dying Antony, her statement of his greatness and bounty, have perhaps considered too heavily in the thoughts that many people have taken from the play as a whole. But the almost unbearable sadness of the last scenes is for what has not in fact been overlooked. It is, of course, one of the signs of a great writer that he can afford to evoke sympathy or even admiration for what, in his final judgement, is discarded or condemned. In Antony and Cleopatra the sense of potential passion between a man and a woman is radically expressed to its climax, and Shakespeare gives the maximum weight to an actual experience that is finally revealed with the death of both.
For Shakespeare has chosen as his tragic theme the impulse that man perhaps most readily associates with a heightened sense of adult life with true marriage. It has not seemed necessary here to explore the range and depth of the passion in which the theme of vital activities resulting with frustration, or entangling itself with social life; but it is, of course, the range and depth of the passion that makes Antony and Cleopatra into universal figures.
Antony and Cleopatra is an account of conflicting story in terms of the Desire and the Morality, Rome and Egypt, the two great contraries that maintain and destroy each other, considered apart from any other people that might stand over against them. If readers find, rightly, that there is something both vague and strained about all these accounts, perhaps that is because a remarkable fact about the bond between Antony and Cleopatera has been consistently overlooked. Whether the bond in question is love, or passion, or both, it is neither of these which the lovers themselves mainly bring to light when they speak of each other or of what is between them.
Most critics have tried to express how the relation between Antony and Cleopatra can be variously seen from many different viewpoints. Mr. Bradley, who said that from one point of view the play was Shakespeare's supreme expression of love as value, also said that to see it as depicting a senseless surrender to passion was defensible. Whether Antony and Cleopatra's lust, or love, or something of both, is probably a matter on which complete agreement cannot be expected. Men use these words as they are guided not only by their sense of value, but also by their experience of life; both of these are liable to much variation, and the critic may find that opportunities for augmenting the second are, in his case, slight, past or unwelcome.
Cleopatra's lament over te dying Antony, her statement of his greatness and bounty, have perhaps considered too heavily in the thoughts that many people have taken from the play as a whole. But the almost unbearable sadness of the last scenes is for what has not in fact been overlooked. It is, of course, one of the signs of a great writer that he can afford to evoke sympathy or even admiration for what, in his final judgement, is discarded or condemned. In Antony and Cleopatra the sense of potential passion between a man and a woman is radically expressed to its climax, and Shakespeare gives the maximum weight to an actual experience that is finally revealed with the death of both.
For Shakespeare has chosen as his tragic theme the impulse that man perhaps most readily associates with a heightened sense of adult life with true marriage. It has not seemed necessary here to explore the range and depth of the passion in which the theme of vital activities resulting with frustration, or entangling itself with social life; but it is, of course, the range and depth of the passion that makes Antony and Cleopatra into universal figures.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
프로이드의 욕망이론에 비춰본 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』
Shakespeare Review
2003 .03
-
Antony and Cleopatra에 나타난 성역할의 전도
Shakespeare Review
1990 .06
-
Antony and Cleopatra : 心象과 性格發展
Shakespeare Review
1973 .04
-
담론과 타자 재현의 양상 : 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』
Shakespeare Review
2004 .06
-
선전선동전의 관점에서 본 『안토니와 클레오파트라』: 알렉산드리아 영토분할령 전후에 유포된 흑색 루머
Shakespeare Review
2019 .09
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』에서의 이중 파국
Shakespeare Review
2007 .09
-
여성의 부재와 여성성의 전복성 : Antony and Cleopatra에 나타난 여성의 재현
코기토
1998 .12
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 페미니즘 전략과 그 한계
Shakespeare Review
2006 .12
-
Histrionic Cleopatra as a Critic of Patriarchy - A Feminist Study of Antony and Cleopatra
Shakespeare Review
1995 .12
-
성서적 관점에서 본 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』 : 클레오파트라의 교만, 음란, 파괴성
Shakespeare Review
2004 .09
-
『앤토니와 클레오파트라』 - 신화적 인물로서의 앤토니와 클레오파트라
Shakespeare Review
1998 .12
-
『앤터니와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 인간관계의 초월적 속성
Shakespeare Review
2001 .06
-
Falstaff-Antony의 정치풍자 : Antony and Cleopatra의 신역사주의적 해석
Shakespeare Review
1991 .12
-
인간 본성의 상징으로 본 『안토니와 클레오파트라』
Shakespeare Review
2013 .09
-
『오셀로: Othello』와 『앤토니와 클레오파트라: Antony and Cleopatra』 : 여성에 대한 시각 차와 극적 흥미
Shakespeare Review
1997 .06
-
역설과 과장 : 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』의 시적 표현법 연구
신영어영문학
2006 .11
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 전복성
영어영문학21
2017 .01
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』다시 읽기 : Theatre and World
Shakespeare Review
2001 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
성서적 관점에서 본 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』 : 클레오파트라의 교만, 음란, 파괴성
강명순
Shakespeare Review
2004
.09
햄릿과 오필리아의 관계 : 수녀원 장면과 극중극 장면을 중심으로
최민경
Shakespeare Review
2007
.12
인간 본성의 상징으로 본 『안토니와 클레오파트라』
이행수
Shakespeare Review
2013
.09
「줄리어스 시저」에 나타난 정신에 대해서
한용재
Shakespeare Review
2012
.09
『맥베스』: 에고의 본성
이행수
Shakespeare Review
2011
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003107089