지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2003.12
- 수록면
- 901 - 922 (22page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The English Parliament saw its remarkable development in the age of Shakespeare. It is without question that the parliamentary context must have been considered in the interpretations of Shakespeare's histories, whether English or Roman, the primary social function of which was to give comments on the contemporary politics. Unfortunately, however, this parliamentary context has often been neglected in the studies of the histories in spite of its political significance. Initiated with this sense of problem, I have kept my eye on the reciprocal relationship between the development of Parliament and Shakespeare's histories under the theme of the rule of law tradition. Especially, in the two Roman history plays now under our consideration, the rule of the law tradition is much more obviously represented than in the previous English history plays.
In Julius Caesar Brutus resists the tyranny of Caesar as a leading proponent of republicanism, the origin of which goes back to the ancient Roman constitution. Interestingly, the efforts of Brutus' side is paralleled by the contemporary parliamentarians' endeavor to limit king's power in the name of law. Shakespeare dramatizes the conflicts between republicanism and monarchism in this play. He is not, however, just indifferent to both of them. Rather, he seems to have a sympathy with republicanism. Coriolanus, on the other hand, provides us with a good example of an absolutist as a political misfit. Coriolanus is regarded as subversive in the Roman society just as James I in England proved to be so. Rewriting the ancient Roman history in the context of the contemporary politics Shakespeare denies absolutism and gives endorsement to the rule of law tradition. It is historically significant that Shakespeare's Roman plays rehearse the constitutional monarchy the English people would have in the later half of the seventeenth century.
In Julius Caesar Brutus resists the tyranny of Caesar as a leading proponent of republicanism, the origin of which goes back to the ancient Roman constitution. Interestingly, the efforts of Brutus' side is paralleled by the contemporary parliamentarians' endeavor to limit king's power in the name of law. Shakespeare dramatizes the conflicts between republicanism and monarchism in this play. He is not, however, just indifferent to both of them. Rather, he seems to have a sympathy with republicanism. Coriolanus, on the other hand, provides us with a good example of an absolutist as a political misfit. Coriolanus is regarded as subversive in the Roman society just as James I in England proved to be so. Rewriting the ancient Roman history in the context of the contemporary politics Shakespeare denies absolutism and gives endorsement to the rule of law tradition. It is historically significant that Shakespeare's Roman plays rehearse the constitutional monarchy the English people would have in the later half of the seventeenth century.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
셰익스피어와 정치적 정의: 『줄리어스 시저』를 중심으로
영어영문학연구
2013 .01
-
Shakespeare In Korea
Shakespeare Review
2002 .09
-
셰익스피어의 두 번째 4부작과 영국에서의 법적 통치 전통
Shakespeare Review
2002 .06
-
Colonial Shakespeares : Shakespeare in Korea, 1906-1945
Shakespeare Review
1997 .12
-
민족시인의 형성 : 왕정복고기와 18세기 영국의 셰익스피어
Shakespeare Review
2015 .09
-
Shakespeare’s Political Skepticism in His Roman Plays
Shakespeare Review
2017 .09
-
Shakespeare연구의 성과
비평문학
1990 .09
-
한국에서의 Shakespeare 연구 조사(Ⅱ)
Shakespeare Review
1995 .06
-
Shakespeare in Japanese
Shakespeare Review
2002 .09
-
셰익스피어 부흥과 여성 관객의 역할—“셰익스피어 레이디스 클럽”
영어영문학21
2012 .01
-
셰익스피어와 그의 사극에 나타난 평민들
영어영문학연구
2013 .01
-
19세기 아동 문학 풍토와 램 남매의 『셰익스피어 이야기』각색 연구
Shakespeare Review
2017 .03
-
『코리오레이너스』에 나타난 정치적 대립과 갈등의 문제
영어영문학
2019 .05
-
셰익스피어의 극과 음악
새한영어영문학
2012 .02
-
로마 사극에 나타난 셰익스피어의 민중관 : 『줄리어스 시저』와 『코리오레이너스』
Shakespeare Review
2006 .09
-
18세기 셰익스피어 : 영국 국가영웅 이미지
Shakespeare Review
2007 .03
-
셰익스피어 로마극의 재평가 : 『안토니와 클레오파트라』를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2004 .12
-
Shakespeare극중 초자연적 요소의 고찰
비평문학
1991 .10
-
『코리올레이너스』: 셰익스피어의 비극에 나타난 정치성
Shakespeare Review
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Shakespeare's Henry Ⅳ as a Representation of History
Young Cho Lee
Shakespeare Review
2006
.09
『햄릿』과 셰익스피어 비극의 정치성
송창섭
Shakespeare Review
2006
.12
18세기 셰익스피어 : 영국 국가영웅 이미지
한영림
Shakespeare Review
2007
.03
셰익스피어와 19세기 미국의 꿈 : 미국 국가정체성 만들기
한영림
Shakespeare Review
2009
.06
Cultural Politics of Shakespeare's Roman History Plays
Kim Kang
새한영어영문학
2003
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003100479