지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Starting the first exhibition of in October 2013, a chef director Younghan Chung held the fifth exhibition of ‘MinimalHouse’ this July (2015). The exhibition ‘Minimal House’ is a long term exhibition that is held twice a year forfive years, holding ten relay exhibition in a total. For each exhibition, ‘Minimal house’ provides an opportunity to three architects to display built project or the project to be built with a common theme of ‘Minimal A minimal house is not a small house. Yet, it is not a tiny house either. Then, would it be an economical house?
From the beginning, the meaning of ‘Minimal house’ should not be defined by a chef director. Focusing only on the price and the size of a house is the starting point of the exhibition ‘Minimal house’. Looking at the recent building trend that mimics popular styles of architecture from abroad countries or limits the opportunity to the economic value, I realized a necessity for tightening a gap between architects and the public. The price and size of a house that we are familiar with is relative. However, it is natural a little house to become a very tiny house for someone and expensive price to feel reasonable for someone depending on the personal memory and experience. Furthermore, It is irresistible to have distinct needs of space and financial sense for each person, even for family members.
However, most of the people leans towards the size of the house over the quality and needs of space in order to avoid any following comparison and judgment on the digits of their bank account. Thus, even before having a chance to question the way we obtain a house, our lifestyle is aching from the identical size and uniform structure of condominiums. To mend this sickness of our society, we need to reach out to the true customizing just like tailoring a cloth to fit perfectly. Until now, even though there were various or fancy clothes, we have experienced discomfort due to the feeling that they were made for the manufacturers, not for the users. As much as finding a perfectly fitting clothe, the way we obtain the clothe -the way we own the property- is crucial.
Long time ago, Friedrich Engels declaimed that ownership of a profitless house would degenerate a laborer to a serf. Rather than owning a house, in the past, people took for granted inheriting a house or paying rent for a house. However, in 1937, anyone could own a house with the advent of the ‘Mortgage loan system’ by Federal Housing Administration of United states to ease the housing shortage after the World War I. Like Engels said, this method of ownership turned us into a modern serf, who works the entire life to pay off the loan for housing.
Considering the housing market under the current economic condition of South Korea, we still depend on borrowing housing loan for large scale condominium by major construction firms as a part of the government led development projects. I consider this is the time that architects and the public need to contemplate together about how to define the proper space for one’s lifestyle and what is the type of house that reacts on one’s lifestyle through the value of the ‘Minimal’ as I mentioned above. The contemplation begins from looking at the meaning of the minimals in the daily life and determining the definition of appropriate living space. The ultimate goal of the exhibition ‘Minimal House’ is finding diverse pictures of dwelling of this era that must expand its meaning from ownership to share and from occupying a space to possessing time.
From the beginning, the meaning of ‘Minimal house’ should not be defined by a chef director. Focusing only on the price and the size of a house is the starting point of the exhibition ‘Minimal house’. Looking at the recent building trend that mimics popular styles of architecture from abroad countries or limits the opportunity to the economic value, I realized a necessity for tightening a gap between architects and the public. The price and size of a house that we are familiar with is relative. However, it is natural a little house to become a very tiny house for someone and expensive price to feel reasonable for someone depending on the personal memory and experience. Furthermore, It is irresistible to have distinct needs of space and financial sense for each person, even for family members.
However, most of the people leans towards the size of the house over the quality and needs of space in order to avoid any following comparison and judgment on the digits of their bank account. Thus, even before having a chance to question the way we obtain a house, our lifestyle is aching from the identical size and uniform structure of condominiums. To mend this sickness of our society, we need to reach out to the true customizing just like tailoring a cloth to fit perfectly. Until now, even though there were various or fancy clothes, we have experienced discomfort due to the feeling that they were made for the manufacturers, not for the users. As much as finding a perfectly fitting clothe, the way we obtain the clothe -the way we own the property- is crucial.
Long time ago, Friedrich Engels declaimed that ownership of a profitless house would degenerate a laborer to a serf. Rather than owning a house, in the past, people took for granted inheriting a house or paying rent for a house. However, in 1937, anyone could own a house with the advent of the ‘Mortgage loan system’ by Federal Housing Administration of United states to ease the housing shortage after the World War I. Like Engels said, this method of ownership turned us into a modern serf, who works the entire life to pay off the loan for housing.
Considering the housing market under the current economic condition of South Korea, we still depend on borrowing housing loan for large scale condominium by major construction firms as a part of the government led development projects. I consider this is the time that architects and the public need to contemplate together about how to define the proper space for one’s lifestyle and what is the type of house that reacts on one’s lifestyle through the value of the ‘Minimal’ as I mentioned above. The contemplation begins from looking at the meaning of the minimals in the daily life and determining the definition of appropriate living space. The ultimate goal of the exhibition ‘Minimal House’ is finding diverse pictures of dwelling of this era that must expand its meaning from ownership to share and from occupying a space to possessing time.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1950~1970년대 국민주택 담론과 개념에 관한 연구
대한건축학회논문집
2021 .04
-
공동체주거 : 현대적 확대가족의 삶
건축
2016 .05
-
서울의 가족구조 변화, 주택시장 변화에 따른 소규모 집합주택의 변화에 대한 연구
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2016 .10
-
주택의 용도분류 개편 방안 연구
대한건축학회논문집
2023 .05
-
주택시장의 특성이 심리-가격민감도에 미치는 영향
국토계획
2022 .11
-
사회주택 Centre Village의 공간구조분석
KIEAE Journal
2018 .12
-
The Relation between Housing Needs and Housing Function according to the Maslow"s Theory of Needs
KIEAE Journal
2017 .08
-
인구변화 대응 수요 맞춤형 공동체 주택(Community Housing) 사례 분석 : 청년 및 노인층 1∼2인가구를 중심으로
한국생태환경건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2021 .05
-
공공주도형 공동체주택의 주거만족도 연구 : 서울시 사례를 중심으로
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2017 .06
-
서울시 고가주택에 대한 담보대출 규제가 주택가격 및 거래량 변화에 미치는 영향
국토계획
2022 .10
-
여성전용 셰어하우스의 지역 분포특성과 의미에 관한 연구 : 서울의 운영사 관리형 현장 사례를 중심으로
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2019 .04
-
주택유형별 주택가격 변동성에 관한 연구 - 통화정책과 부동산대책 효과를 중심으로 -
대한건축학회연합논문집
2018 .01
-
이주 전후 거주요구를 비교한 소규모 단지형 전원주택 계획 연구 : 진주 삼봉마을을 중심으로
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2017 .10
-
중국 사회주택의 공급제도 및 생산방식에 대한 연구 - 상하이 공공임대주택 7가지 사례를 중심으로 -
대한건축학회논문집
2025 .04
-
주택 소요 및 선호에 따른 지진재해 지역 주거정책 - 포항시 특별재난지역을 중심으로 -
국토계획
2019 .06
-
한국은 어떻게 자조주택을 변용했는가? : 완성주택 공급과 주택금융 도입을 중심으로
국토계획
2020 .12
-
청 · 장년층 1인가구의 주거수요에 따른 주택 개발방향 연구
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2016 .07
-
공공임대주택 유형 및 복합입지가 주택매매가격에 미치는 영향 비교분석
국토계획
2018 .10
-
전이공간을 통해 본 마을형 공동체주택의 계획 특성 연구 - 면목동 도서당과 홍은동 써드플레이스 사례를 대상으로 -
대한건축학회논문집
2023 .02
-
거시경제변동과 주택정책이 주택가격에 미치는 영향 분석 : 거시계량모형을 활용하여
국토계획
2021 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-540-000735862