메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신세정 (이화여자대학교) 이은주 (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.16 Number.4
발행연도
2016.12
수록면
671 - 694 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study investigates the effects of corpus-based vocabulary learning on the beginning-level learners’ acquisition and attitude toward English vocabulary. For this purpose, a total of 81 elementary school students were divided into three groups: a control group and two experimental groups. The students took a pre-vocabulary test and were assigned to high and low level proficiency groups. One experimental group was instructed by the teacher-centered and corpus-based vocabulary learning method and the other experimental group was instructed by learner-centered corpus-based vocabulary learning method. The control group was taught using the traditional method, i.e., definition-based vocabulary learning. The results of the study manifested that the corpus-based vocabulary learning method did not show greater effects on the acquisition of both receptive and productive knowledge of vocabulary than the traditional method. For both high- and low-level students, there was no significant difference in the effects of vocabulary learning between the corpus-based groups and the traditional instruction group. Further, corpus-based vocabulary learning did not have greater effects on the retention of both receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge than traditional instruction. These results may support the claims (e.g. , Benet t , 2010; Flowerdew, 2012) that the corpus-based tasks which have an intrinsically high cognitive load may be too difficult to beginning level learners. The results of the questionnaire survey showed that the students mostly had positive attitudes towards the corpus-based vocabulary learning methods. It is to be hoped that future corpus-based studies will include a careful consideration of the issue of cognitive loads when designing different types of corpus-based pedagogical tasks.

목차

1. 서론
2. 선행 연구
3. 연구 방법 및 절차
4. 연구 결과 및 논의
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-705-002018007