메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이주연 (부산대학교) 신상근 (부산대학교)
저널정보
한국발육발달학회 한국발육발달학회지 한국발육발달학회지 제28권 제1호
발행연도
2020.2
수록면
7 - 15 (9page)
DOI
10.34284/KJGD.2020.02.28.1.7

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to find out which exercise is more effective in Senior fitness test(SFT) and Self-efficacy. Aerobic exercise and resistance exercise are aligned with the ACSM exercise guideline(low-intensity and long-term). thirty seven people of female women aged over 65 years old particiated in this study. They were divided into aerobic exercise group(AEG, n=14, 71.8±4.9 yrs), resistance exercise group(REG, n=13, 75.1±6.0 yrs) and control group(CG, n=10, 75.3±4.7 yrs) .The aerobic exercise group was walk at the treadmil and the resistance exercise group used a machine. Both group carried out three times a week for 16 weeks. In this study used two-way ANOVA repeated measures. Post-hoc was Scheffé test and significant level was set to 0.5. According to the result of this study, In Senior Fitness Test, 30-second chiar stand test showed significant increase in the aerobic group (p<.001). 30-second arm curl test, in aerobic exercise group (p<.01) and the resistance exercise group (p<0.01) showed a significant increase. 2.44 m timed up and go tests show significant increases in aerobic and resistance exercise groups (p<.05-p<.01). two-minute step test showed a significant increase in aerobic exercise groups (p<.05). In self-efficacy, the interaction effects (p<.05) were shown, and in the post-hoc results, the resistance exercise group was higher than the control group. In Self-efficacy has only had a positive effect on the resistance group. Therefore, aerobic exercise also has an effect on SFT, but it is recommended that resistance exercise be encouraged for female women to improve their SFT and self-efficacy.

목차

Abstract
I. 서론
II. 연구방법
III. 결과
IV. 논의
V. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (47)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-692-000467067