개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.9
- 수록면
- 563 - 584 (22page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Language is a power in Julius Caesar. Cassius persuades Brutus to participate in the conspiracy against Caesar, repeating the word “honor,” because “honor” is the important virtue that Brutus wishes to keep. Brutus tries to persuade the populace through logical prose, but he fails to defend his murdering of Caesar. However, Anthony succeeds in persuading the populace through the rhetoric of his speech which is delivered using emotional verses. His speech draws their support and instigates the populace to rebel against the murderers of Caesar. In spite of Antony's disingenuous claims that “I am no orator, as Brutus is” (3.2.217), Antony knows his business and the effective way to stimulate people's minds.
Brutus’ prose speech is logical, figurative, abstract, and ideal, but cannot be an effective speech to appeal to the populace. Anthony's verse, which is emotional, direct, concrete, and actual, has a strong appeal to the populace. To stimulate the populace, the speech of Anthony is much more effective than that of Brutus. Before the battle with Anthony, Brutus is already pushed out from the power struggle. He fails to draw the populace's support, despite insisting that he took part in the conspiracy against Caesar to protect Roman liberties. On the other hand, Anthony manipulates the populace by stimulating their minds to stand up against Brutus through the rhetoric of great appeal. His rhetoric is much more effective and has the power to manipulate the populace. He secures the support of the populace through a demagogic speech and wins a victory in the struggle for power. Therefore, in Julius Caesar, language serves as an effective weapon, and political power depends on the power of language.
Brutus’ prose speech is logical, figurative, abstract, and ideal, but cannot be an effective speech to appeal to the populace. Anthony's verse, which is emotional, direct, concrete, and actual, has a strong appeal to the populace. To stimulate the populace, the speech of Anthony is much more effective than that of Brutus. Before the battle with Anthony, Brutus is already pushed out from the power struggle. He fails to draw the populace's support, despite insisting that he took part in the conspiracy against Caesar to protect Roman liberties. On the other hand, Anthony manipulates the populace by stimulating their minds to stand up against Brutus through the rhetoric of great appeal. His rhetoric is much more effective and has the power to manipulate the populace. He secures the support of the populace through a demagogic speech and wins a victory in the struggle for power. Therefore, in Julius Caesar, language serves as an effective weapon, and political power depends on the power of language.
목차
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Barton, Anne / 1988 / Rhetoric in Ancient Rome, In Modern Critical Interpretations: W. Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar / Chelsea House : 79 ~ 89
2. [단행본] - Burckhardt, Sigurd / 2004 / How Not to Murder Caesar, In Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory 1945-2000 / Blackwell : 209 ~ 19
3. [단행본] - Charney, Maurice / 1961 / Shakespeare’s Roman Plays: The Function of Imagery in the Drama / Harvard UP
4. [단행본] - Charney, Maurice / 1993 / All of Shakespeare / Columbia UP
5. [단행본] - Granville-Barker, Harley / 1975 / Prefaces to Shakespeare. Vol 2. 1947 / Princeton UP
2. [단행본] - Burckhardt, Sigurd / 2004 / How Not to Murder Caesar, In Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory 1945-2000 / Blackwell : 209 ~ 19
3. [단행본] - Charney, Maurice / 1961 / Shakespeare’s Roman Plays: The Function of Imagery in the Drama / Harvard UP
4. [단행본] - Charney, Maurice / 1993 / All of Shakespeare / Columbia UP
5. [단행본] - Granville-Barker, Harley / 1975 / Prefaces to Shakespeare. Vol 2. 1947 / Princeton UP
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-840-000845042