지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.9
- 수록면
- 639 - 659 (21page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This essay explores the ways in which Shakespeare dramatizes the question of spirit in Julius Caesar. By closely reading the scenes in which the word spirit appears, it aims to explicate the fundamental nature of spirit. To be more specific, I argue that spirit is power. Caesar is a case in point. Despite physical limitedness and frailties, he lives in such a way as to overcome and transcend them. He even faces death as if he aspires to live forever as a spirit in the minds of Romans. His life, in a sense, can be read as a kind of process toward the birth of spiritual power and spirit as power. However, what is interesting about the nature of spirit is that anyone who possesses as powerful spirit as Caesar may become the source of power as well, thereby creating a new spirit. This is why revolt is structurally possible; spirit brings about anti-spirit. Brutus’s rebellion against Caesar can be understood in this line of thought. Brutus, as well as Cassius, strives to replace the spirit of Caesar that they defined as tyranny with a new spirit based upon peace, freedom, and liberty. They believe that they would herald a new spirit. Yet their ambition faces an unexpected barrier, as Antony redefines the spirit of Caesar as an emblem of sacrifice and successfully instigates plebeians to riot. Antony revives the spirit of Caesar by bringing the plebeians together, demonstrating that the collective power of people animates spirit. As a result, the conflict between the spirit of Caesar and anti-Caesar spirit escalates to the level of war. Shakespeare, in other words, seems to show that the nature of spirit is fundamentally warfare, as best shown in the employment of fire in the play. By associating spirit with a fire, which both literally and symbolically represents warfare. he is seen to confirm that the power of spirit, or spirit as power, is warfare of fire, which simultaneously inflames itself and others although Romans like us fight for ethical assumptions and values.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 게오르크 빌헬름 프리드리히 헤겔 / 2005 / 정신현상학 / 한길사
5. [단행본] - Bloom,Harold / 1998 / Shakespeare:the Invention of the Human / Riverhead Books
6. [단행본] - Derrida, Jacques / 1989 / Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question / U of Chicago P
7. [단행본] - Dorsch, T. S / 2008 / Introduction: Language and Imagery, In Bloom’s Shakespeare Through the Ages: Julius Caesar / Checkmark Books : 212 ~ 219
8. [단행본] - Ferguson, Francis / 2011 / Shakespeare Presents All Characters Sympathetically Tyranny in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar / Gale : 104 ~ 110
5. [단행본] - Bloom,Harold / 1998 / Shakespeare:the Invention of the Human / Riverhead Books
6. [단행본] - Derrida, Jacques / 1989 / Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question / U of Chicago P
7. [단행본] - Dorsch, T. S / 2008 / Introduction: Language and Imagery, In Bloom’s Shakespeare Through the Ages: Julius Caesar / Checkmark Books : 212 ~ 219
8. [단행본] - Ferguson, Francis / 2011 / Shakespeare Presents All Characters Sympathetically Tyranny in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar / Gale : 104 ~ 110
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『줄리어스 시저』의 거울구조
이행수
Shakespeare Review
2006
.09
『줄리어스 시저』에 나타난 설득과 선동의 언어
김종환
Shakespeare Review
2011
.09
『안토니와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 욕망과 도덕성의 갈등의 기상도
박현수
Shakespeare Review
2002
.06
『타이터스 안드로니커스』(Titus Andronicus)의 아론(Aaron)의 악한성에 대한 비판적 고찰
김희주
Shakespeare Review
2016
.09
『줄리어스 시저』의 프로이드적 읽기 : 원시부족과 그룹정치
장선영
Shakespeare Review
2015
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-840-001251700