지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.9
- 수록면
- 461 - 479 (19page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
One of the main themes of Julius Caesar is that a man needs a particular other as a mirror to find his identity. Shakespeare seems to tell us that to know one's real self through his relationships with others around him is one of the important purposes of life.
In Julius Caesar, every character takes the role of a mirror to reflect another. Brutus reflects Julius Caesar, Cassius reflects Brutus and Brutus reflects Cassius. Present history reflects previous history as we see when the plebeians welcome Julius Caesar after he conquers Pompey, as they had upheld Pompey as the Lord before. This drama appears to deal with political problems, but actually its focus is more on the problems of pursuing identity than on conflicts of a political nature.
Cassius said that he would be a mirror by which Brutus could see himself clearly in a way that he was as yet unaware. Therefore the characteristics of Cassius can be regarded as those of Brutus. The characters of Cassius and Brutus may appear to be very different, but the inner reality is that the character of Brutus reflects that of Cassius.
Not a few critics complain about the ambiguous characterization of Brutus. While Cassius is revealed as a cunning and mean politician, the reputation of Brutus is good. Brutus is known as a noble man and is always described as an honourable man, but he may be self-deceptive in the sense that he does not realize his reality even though he does not disguise himself on purpose.
Finding oneself through the mirrors around one and awakening to self-deception is not realized by any of the characters in Julius Caesar. It may be one of the messages of the drama that we the readers have to realize; that man must try to find his real identity through his relationships with others who act as mirrors to reflect him, and that this is difficult to achieve.
In Julius Caesar, every character takes the role of a mirror to reflect another. Brutus reflects Julius Caesar, Cassius reflects Brutus and Brutus reflects Cassius. Present history reflects previous history as we see when the plebeians welcome Julius Caesar after he conquers Pompey, as they had upheld Pompey as the Lord before. This drama appears to deal with political problems, but actually its focus is more on the problems of pursuing identity than on conflicts of a political nature.
Cassius said that he would be a mirror by which Brutus could see himself clearly in a way that he was as yet unaware. Therefore the characteristics of Cassius can be regarded as those of Brutus. The characters of Cassius and Brutus may appear to be very different, but the inner reality is that the character of Brutus reflects that of Cassius.
Not a few critics complain about the ambiguous characterization of Brutus. While Cassius is revealed as a cunning and mean politician, the reputation of Brutus is good. Brutus is known as a noble man and is always described as an honourable man, but he may be self-deceptive in the sense that he does not realize his reality even though he does not disguise himself on purpose.
Finding oneself through the mirrors around one and awakening to self-deception is not realized by any of the characters in Julius Caesar. It may be one of the messages of the drama that we the readers have to realize; that man must try to find his real identity through his relationships with others who act as mirrors to reflect him, and that this is difficult to achieve.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『줄리어스 시이저』에 나타난 브루터스의 정치적 실천전략의 부재
영어영문학
2018 .02
-
정치심리학에서 본 『줄리어스 시저』
영어영문학연구
2015 .01
-
셰익스피어와 정치적 정의: 『줄리어스 시저』를 중심으로
영어영문학연구
2013 .01
-
『줄리어스 시저』에 나타난 설득 기술
영어영문학연구
2011 .01
-
『줄리어스 시저』: 힘에의 의지
Shakespeare Review
2007 .06
-
『줄리어스 시저』의 프로이드적 읽기 : 원시부족과 그룹정치
Shakespeare Review
2015 .12
-
줄리어스 시이저의 이중적 자아 이미지
영어영문학
2016 .05
-
정의 구현과 치유의 상관관계: Julius Caesar와 Caesar Must Die 비교 연구
고전 르네상스 영문학
2014 .01
-
합리적 개인주의 : 『줄리어스 시저』와 『햄릿』에 나타난 주체 형성하기
동서비교문학저널
2018 .09
-
Julius Caesar에서 WILL과 SHALL
신영어영문학
1994 .02
-
『줄리어스 시저』에 나타난 설득과 선동의 언어
Shakespeare Review
2011 .09
-
실패한 비극작가, 브루터스 : 『줄리어스 시저』에서의 ‘시대착오’ 의미 연구
Shakespeare Review
2006 .03
-
셰익스피어『줄리어스 시저』에 나타난 ‘차이’와 ‘반복’의 양상
Shakespeare Review
2014 .09
-
브루터스와 영국 사회의 위기
Shakespeare Review
2004 .12
-
수사학과 Julius Caesar
Shakespeare Review
1995 .06
-
이데올로기의 구조로서의 씨이저리즘
Shakespeare Review
2002 .03
-
Julius Caesar 에 있어서의 소재변용
Shakespeare Review
1986 .08
-
The Aspect of the Stoic Elements in Julius Caesar
영어영문학
2007 .06
-
「줄리어스 시저」에 나타난 ‘위기의 사회’
고전 르네상스 영문학
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
「줄리어스 시저」에 나타난 정신에 대해서
한용재
Shakespeare Review
2012
.09
『줄리어스 시저』에 나타난 설득과 선동의 언어
김종환
Shakespeare Review
2011
.09
셰익스피어의 인물들에 반영된 16, 17세기 의료 장면들 : 의사, 마법, 마법사들
김라옥
Shakespeare Review
2014
.06
"Liberty, Freedom, and Enfranchisement!" : Julius Caesar for London Apprentices
Kang Taekyeong
Shakespeare Review
2001
.09
『쥴리어스 씨이저』- 권력과 저항의 갈등 구조
이향미
Shakespeare Review
1999
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003108228