메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Yalin Wang (Seoul National University)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.22
발행연도
2022.1
수록면
396 - 417 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study aims to investigate how L2 writers of different Asian backgrounds (China and Korea) with advanced English proficiency employ linking adverbials in their academic English essays in comparison to native writers. By controlling extraneous variables such as writing conditions and essay type, this study constructed a corpus of the data extracted from the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE) and 96 extra assignments from Chinese undergraduates. It analyzed the production tendencies in four types of categories of linking adverbials in the writing of different L1 groups, whether there are idiosyncratic or overlapping phenomena, and the potential rationales under the English education contexts of China and Korea. The findings revealed the common pattern of overuse of overall linking adverbials and functional categories by both groups, as well as the high dependence on specific cohesion markers that have not been emphasized previously, which indicates the non-naive writers tend to disregard issues of informality, functional degree of linking adverbials or intimacy between the sentences, and to favor sentence-initial positioning. It emphasizes the lack of faculty personnel resources and high-standard recruitment system for more qualified teachers in China, and necessary remedies for instructional methodologies for both China and Korea. This study also argues that one reason for the higher usage is the influence of negative washback of English language examinations in China and Korea and a set of model texts from reference books were examined. Pedagogical points of the results were subsequently provided.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Results and Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0