메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jisu Ryu (Seoul National University) Byungmin Lee (Seoul National University)
저널정보
한국응용언어학회 응용언어학 응용언어학 제34권 제4호
발행연도
2018.12
수록면
255 - 286 (32page)
DOI
10.17154/kjal.2018.12.34.4.255

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Despite the synergistic effects of task complexity and planning on speaking performances and focus on form, as implied in previous studies, past research solely looked at their individual effects. Thus, this study explored effects of task complexity and planning on L2 spoken performances and focus on form. Korean EFL low-intermediate learners (n=40) completed picture description tasks in four different conditions (i.e., simple no planning [SN], complex no planning [CN], simple planning [SP] and complex planning [CP]) with post-task questionnaires. Results showed that task complexity and planning had interaction effects on lexical complexity and accuracy. In addition, positive main effects of task complexity were found on syntactic complexity. Positive main effects of planning were identified on syntactic complexity and fluency. In addition to performance scores, individual learners’ responses to the questionnaires provided further evidence of how they manage attentional resources. Despite the learners’ predisposition to meaning, the successful channelling of attention to form was achieved through increasing task complexity (i.e., from SP to CP). Despite theoretical dichotomy of prior research in the field (i.e., Cognition Hypothesis vs. Trade-off Hypothesis), the current study proposes the potential complementarity of these two frameworks: cognitively demanding tasks coupled with planning time may likely lead to enhanced performances in terms of complexity, accuracy, and fluency of Korean EFL low-intermediate learners. Pedagogical implications are also discussed.

목차

Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
Ⅱ. LITERATURE REVIEW
Ⅲ. METHODOLOGY
Ⅳ. RESULTS
Ⅴ. DISCUSSION
Ⅵ. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (53)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-701-000324077