메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Cho, Katharine Y. (Kyungpook University-Sangju)
저널정보
미래영어영문학회 영어영문학 영어영문학 제24권 제3호
발행연도
2019.8
수록면
373 - 389 (17page)
DOI
10.46449/MJELL.2019.08.24.3.373

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study investigated whether different types of comprehensive written corrective feedback helped EFL students’ grammatical accuracy development, and whether direct or indirect feedback was more effective for them. 64 students were divided into four groups and three received different types of written corrective feedback: direct feedback, coded feedback, and underlined feedback. The fourth group was a control group. A pre-test, five new writings and revisions, and a post-test were administered over a 15 week semester. An analysis of the pre- and post-test indicate that feedback in itself is beneficial to students, as the direct and underlined feedback groups’ improvement was statistically significant. The coded group showed a marginal significance, with the control group showing no improvement. An analysis of the post-tests show that none of the feedback groups outperformed the other nor did they outperform the control group. However, the results were marginally significant. This study supports the idea that students should receive written corrective feedback, regardless of the type.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Literature Review
Ⅲ. Methods
Ⅳ. Results and Discussion
Ⅴ. Conclusion
References
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-740-000986049