메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Richard Moore (Korea University) Hoe Kyeung Kim (Binghamton University) Sang-Geun Lee (Korea University)
저널정보
한국중원언어학회 언어학 연구 언어학연구 제46호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
267 - 286 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The notion of coherence has been criticized by many educators for its vagueness, especially, as a rating criterion. In an effort to investigate the nature of coherent texts, this study employed the service of 10 native English teachers to rate 33 argumentative essays on the sole criteria of coherence. After sorting out the essays as two groups, high- and low-ranked essays, we compared them, especially, in distribution of conjunctions, which have been known as coherence markers, to see the nature of what English native raters called coherent texts. The quantitative aspect of the study showed that high-ranked essays categorically used a wider range of conjunctions resulting in increased coherence. The qualitative aspect also demonstrated that high-ranked essays, differently from low-ranked essays, efficiently arranged four subtypes of conjunctions, which results in higher levels of coherence. This study thus not only gives a chance to peek into the way coherent texts are organized but also makes a very positive contribution to improving low-level ESL/EFL students’ writing skills.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Historical Background of Coherence
3. Special Status of Conjunctions
4. Methodology
5. Results
6. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-705-001768973