메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영어학학회 영어학연구 영어학연구 제22권 제1호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
117 - 136 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is well known that can and may have similar meanings and that the choice of the modal auxiliary in the English sentences is not arbitrary in native speakers' writings. This paper compares the distributions of these two modal auxiliaries in the EFL learners' writings with those of native speakers and examines which factor made the Korean EFL learners' writings non-native. For this purpose, this study took the Competition Model (CM; Bates and MacWhitney, 1982, 1989) as a theoretical framework. We used two corpora (the Korean component of TOEFL11 corpus and the ICE-USA) and extracted all the sentences with can and may. Then, twenty factors were encoded in the extracted sentences, which were subsequently analyzed with R. The encoded data were statistically analyzed with (binary) logistic regression and Behavioral Profile. Through the analysis, the following facts were observed: (i) the uses and distributions of can and may in the Korean EFL learners' writings are similar to those of (American) native speakers' counterpart, (ii) three factors (SubjMorph, SubjPers, and Mood) make the Korean EFL learners' English non-native, and (iii) the L1 effects were also observed in spite of similarities in the use of the modal auxiliaries between Korean learners of English and native speakers of American English.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0