메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
변지현 (한남대학교) 지민정 (The University of Queensland)
저널정보
한국현대영어영문학회 현대영어영문학 현대영어영문학 제63권 제1호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
27 - 46 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study investigated EFL students’ reactions on three types of feedback (i.e., Korean instructor, English native-speaker instructor, and peer) on their English composition. The study also focused on the EFL students’ perceptions on the effective feedback types in their learning. A total of eighteen students who enrolled in English composition class (third-year level) at a private university in Korea participated in this study. Seventeen were English major students and one was dual-major student. Over the fifteen weeks, the students participated in writing composition tasks, interview, survey, and open-ended questions. According to the findings of the study, the EFL students most preferred the feedback by English native speaker instructor, but that did not mean they did not like feedback by Korean instructor. In other words, the students preferred feedback by the Korean instructor in terms of getting detailed explanation on grammars as a preparation of a test. They thought feedback by the English native-speaker instructor was effective in terms of getting knowledge on authentic expressions emphasizing natural expressions in context. They also thought peer feedback was important because they could develop various ideas with others. The EFL students believed the ideal feedback was process-based feedback that could be provided from the initial stage (e.g., brainstorming) to each writing stage rather than feedback provided with the final product. Furthermore, they believed that getting feedback from both Korean instructor and English native-speaker instructor would be effective because each had different benefits for their writing process.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0